Preview

Russian Journal of Parasitology

Advanced search

Visual and molecular serologic diagnosis of sarcocystosis in cattle

https://doi.org/10.31016/1998-8435-2024-18-2-163-169

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to provide a comparative assessment of efficacy of different diagnostic methods for sarcocystosis in cattle.
Materials and methods. Seventy-eight bovine carcasses were examined using methods and regulations of veterinary and sanitary examination. Muscles of the esophagus and other parts of the carcass as well as the spleen, lungs, the liver, and kidneys were examined. The compressor research method was used. A total of 156 compressoria from 78 bovine carcasses were analyzed for tissue sarcocystosis. For life-time diagnostics of bovine sarcocystosis, a molecular serologic method (ELISA) was used that was developed based on antibody detection principles.
Results and discussion. Two diagnostic methods, visual inspection and compressor microscopy, identified 13 out of 78 carcasses with Sarcocystis species, which was 16.6%. The number of sarcocystosis animals increased by another 23 cases when studying blood sera from the cattle using ELISA. Thus, we found 36 animals suffering from sarcocystosis out of 78 examined, which was 46%, with tests based on different principles.

About the Authors

I. G. Glamazdin
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Russian Biotechnological University (ROSBIOTECH)"
Russian Federation

Glamazdin Igor G., Doctor of Veterinary Sciences

11, Volokolamskoye Shosse, Moscow, 125080



J. Rutaganira
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Russian Biotechnological University (ROSBIOTECH)"
Russian Federation

Rutaganira Josef

11, Volokolamskoye Shosse, Moscow, 125080



O. A. Panova
All-Russian Scientific Research Institute for Fundamental and Applied Parasitology of Animals and Plant – a branch of the Federal State Budget Scientific Institution “Federal Scientific Centre VIEV” (VNIIP – FSC VIEV)
Russian Federation

Panova Olga A., Candidate of Biological Sciences

28, Bolshaya Cheremushkinskaya st., Moscow, 117218



N. Y. Sysoeva
Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Russian Biotechnological University (ROSBIOTECH)"
Russian Federation

Sysoeva Natalia Y.

11, Volokolamskoye Shosse, Moscow, 125080



D. Halim
Al-Beroni University
Afghanistan

Halim Dadullah

Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Zoology



References

1. Glamazdin I. G., Sysoeva N. Yu., Kryukovskaya G. M., Li E. B. Efficiency of immunodiagnostic studies in tissue parasitosis of pigs. Health, Food & Biotechnology. 2019; 1 (4): 11-18. (In Russ.) BIOCHEMISTRY, BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DIAGNOSTICS 2024;18(2):163-169

2. Drozdova L. I., Kundryukova U. I. Sarcocystosis in cattle. BIO. 2019; 9 (228): 32-33. (In Russ.)

3. Polyanskaya O. V., Sivkov G. S. Spread of sarcocystosis in cattle in the Tyumen Region. «Problemy entomologii i arakhnologii»: sbornik nauchnykh trudov «Issues of entomology and arachnology»: collection of scientific papers. Tyumen, 2002; 134-136. (In Russ.)

4. Cerva L., Cerná Z. Indirect haemagglutination reaction with Sarcocystis dispersa antigen. Folia Parasitol. (Praha). 1982; 29 (3): 219-225.

5. Cerva L., Gut J. Indirect haemagglutination reaction with antigen of Sarcocystis gigantea (Railliet, 1886) Ashford, 1977. Folia Parasitol. (Praha). 1983; 30 (3): 223-228.

6. Dini F. M., Caffara M., Jacinto J. G. P., Benazzi C., Gentile A., Galuppi R. A Case of Bovine Eosinophilic Myositis (BEM) Associated with Co-Infection by Sarcocystis hominis and Toxoplasma gondii. Animals (Basel). 2023; 13 (2): 311.

7. Gjerde B. Molecular characterisation of Sarcocystis bovifelis, Sarcocystis bovini n. sp., Sarcocystis hirsuta and Sarcocystis cruzi from cattle (Bos taurus) and Sarcocystis sinensis from water buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Parasitol. Res. 2016; 115 (4): 1473-1492.

8. Habeeb Y. S. M., Selim M. A., Ali M. S., Mahmoud L. A., Adel Hadi A. M., Shafei A. Serological diagnosis of extraintestinal sarcocystosis. J. Egypt Soc. Parasitol. 1996; 26: 393-400.

9. Lindsay D. S., Dubey J. P. Neosporosis, Toxoplasmosis, and Sarcocystosis in Ruminants: An Update. Vet. Clin. North Amer. Food Anim. Pract. 2020; 36 (1): 205-222.

10. Svobodová V. Use of ELISA for the diagnostics of ovine sarcocystosis. Folia parasitologica. 1991; 38 (4): 303-308.

11. Tenter A. M. Current research on Sarcocystis species of domestic animals. Intern. J. Parasitol. 1995; 25 (11): 1311-1330.

12. Uggla A., Buxton D. Immune responses against Toxoplasma and Sarcocystis infections in ruminants: diagnosis and prospects for vaccination. Rev. Sci. Tech. 1990; 9 (2): 441-462.

13. Vangeel L., Houf K., Chiers K., Vercruysse J., D'Herde K., Ducatelle R. Molecular-based identification of Sarcocystis hominis in Belgian minced beef. J. Food Prot. 2007; 70: 1523-1526.

14. Author links open overlay panelKatie Waine, Paul M. Bartley, Alistair Cox, Reuben Newsome, Ben Strugnell, Frank Katzer

15. Zeng H., Van Damme I., Kabi T. W., Šoba B., Gabriël S. Sarcocystis species in bovine carcasses from a Belgian abattoir: a cross-sectional study. Parasit. Vectors. 2021; 14: 271.


Review

For citations:


Glamazdin I.G., Rutaganira J., Panova O.A., Sysoeva N.Y., Halim D. Visual and molecular serologic diagnosis of sarcocystosis in cattle. Russian Journal of Parasitology. 2024;18(2):163-169. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31016/1998-8435-2024-18-2-163-169

Views: 554


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-8435 (Print)
ISSN 2541-7843 (Online)