Parasitic Fauna of Domestic Dog (Canis familiaris Dom.) of the Modern Metropolis of Tashkent
https://doi.org/10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-41-49
Abstract
The purpose of the research is a comprehensive study of the fauna of endo- and ectoparasites of dogs (Canis familiaris dom.) of the modern metropolis of Tashkent and their health and sanitary and veterinary importance.
Materials and methods. The collection of material was made from March 2016 till June 2018 in the territory of Tashkent. The dogs were examined during all seasons of year. In total 160 domestic dogs were examined. Collection of helminthes, insects and arachnids was carried out according to the known methods. The study and species identification of the parasites collected was carried out in the laboratory of General Parasitology of the Institute of Zoology of Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistan. To identify quantitative characteristics of the dogs’ parasites, the intensity and extensiveness of invasion were determined.
Results and discussion. It was detected that a domestic dog of the modern metropolis of Tashkent has 21 species of helminthes belonging to the following three classes – Cestoda, Acanthocephala and Nematoda. Ectoparasites are represented by 16 species belonging to two classes – Arachnida and Insecta. The total infection rate of dog populations with helminthes made 93.7%, with ticks 65.6% and with insects 53.7%. The distribution of parasite communities depends on the specific ecological characteristics of the structure and functional features of the metropolis zones. Together with a dog its parasites such as ticks, fleas, lice, and blood sucking two-winged insects enter the urban environment, some of them can parasitize in humans. This explains the role of ectoparasites of dogs in the occurrence of parasitic diseases not only in other domestic animals, but also in humans.
About the Authors
A. A. SafarovUzbekistan
Аlisher А. Safarov
Nukus, Kaipbergenov str., 23
F. Dz. Akramova
Uzbekistan
Firuza Dz. Akramova
Tashkent, 100053, Bagishamol str., 232
U. A. Shakarbaev
Uzbekistan
Ulugbek A. Shakarbaev
Tashkent, 100053, Bagishamol str., 232
D. A. Azimov
Uzbekistan
Dzalaliddin А. Azimov
Tashkent, 100053, Bagishamol str., 232
References
1. Agrinsky N. I. Insects and ticks harming farm animals. Moscow, 1961; 288. (in Russ.)
2. Vysotskaya S. O. The biocenotic relations between ectoparasites of the bank vole (Clethrionomus glareolus Schreb.) and inhabitants of its nests in the Transcarpathian region of the Ukrainian SSR. Parasitological collection of the Institute of Zoology. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1974; 114–143. (in Russ.)
3. Doszhanov T. N. Louse flies (Diptera, Hippoboscidae) of the Palearctic. Almaty, 2003; 278. (in Russ.)
4. Dremova V. P. Urban entomology. Harmful arthropods in the urban environment. Yekaterinburg, 2005; 279. (in Russ.)
5. Zolotarev N. A. Study of ticks (Arachnids). Veterinary laboratory practice. Moscow, 1963; 2: 316–384. (in Russ.)
6. Kozlov D. P. Determinant of helminthes of predatory mammals of the USSR. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1977; 276. (in Russ.)
7. Sklyar V. E. Parasitic insects and ticks are the basis for parasite cenosis of the common vole (Mikrotus arvalis Pall., 1778) of the South-East of Ukraine. Problems of modern parasitology. Saint-Petersburg, 2003; part 2. 117–119. (in Russ.)
8. Skryabin K. I. Methods of full helminthological dissections of vertebrates including humans. Moscow: MGU Publ., 1928; 45. (in Russ.)
9. Sultanov M. A., Azimov D. A., Gekhtin V. I., Muminov P. A. Helminthes of domestic mammals of Uzbekistan. Tashkent: Fan Publ., 1975; 184. (in Russ.)
10. Shults R. S., Gvozdev V. E. Essentials of general helminthology. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1972; 2. 315. (in Russ.)
11. Halliwell Richard E. W. Dogs and Ectoparasitic Zoonoses Dogs. Zoonoses and Public Health. CABI: UK-USA, 2013; 162–176.
12. Macperson Calum N. L., Torgerson P. R. Dogs and Cestode Zoonoses. Zoonoses and Public Health. CABI: UK-USA, 2013; 127–152.
13. Morgan E. R. Dogs and Nematode Zoonoses. Zoonoses and Public Health. CABI: UK-USA, 2013; 153–161.
14. Evangelos Falidas et al. Human subcutaneous dirofilariasis caused by Dirofilaria immitis in a Greek adult. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2016; 9: 102–104.
15. Marusi´c Z., Stastny T., Kirac I., Stojcevi´c D., Kruslin B., Tomas D. Subcutaneous dirofilariasis caused by Dirofilaria repens diagnosed by histopathologic and polymerase chain reaction analysis. Acta Dermatovenerol. Croat. 2008; 16: 222–225.
16. Foissac M., Million M., Mary C., Dales J. P., Souraud J. B., Piarroux R. et al. Subcutaneous infection with Dirofilaria immitis nematode in human, France. Emerg Infect. Dis. 2013; 19: 171–172.
17. Morchón R., Carretón E., González–Miguel J., Mellado Hernández I. Heartworm disease (Dirofilaria immitis) and their vectors in Europe – new distribution trends. Front Physiol. 2012; 3: 196.
Review
For citations:
Safarov A.A., Akramova F.D., Shakarbaev U.A., Azimov D.A. Parasitic Fauna of Domestic Dog (Canis familiaris Dom.) of the Modern Metropolis of Tashkent. Russian Journal of Parasitology. 2018;12(4):41-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31016/1998-8435-2018-12-4-41-49